Condorcet Internet Voting Service

Rank, in order of preference, as many or as few candidates as you want to.

Any information about who voted is immediately deleted. No one knows who voted, and there is no record of who voted.

In fact, no record is kept of what rankings were voted, and no one at any point has access to that information.

Because there are so many candidates, feel free to not rank anyone or anything that you don't like.

If you want to check the results, click on "Results" at the bottom of this page. If you do, then, at the upper-right of the "Results" page, select MAM as the Condorcet completion method...because MAM is the designated count method.

Then you'll be shown the results according to the MAM count. Often or usually, it won't matter much or at all which Condorcet completion method is used.

By the way, if you want our "real" elections to be legitimate and real, then you have to demand and get transparent verifiable vote-counting.

I have complete confidence in the automated count here at CIVS, but public political elections, in which those running things have so much at stake, so much count-fraud motivation, require transparent verifiable vote-counting.

Public political lections without verifiable vote-counting are illegitimate elections.

The most important, interesting and enjoyable part of voting is looking at the various parties' platforms. That's how you find out, from them, what they offer.

You're invited to look at some of the various party-platforms, via the link below.

But I emphasize that the platforms-link is optional, and that you're also invited to vote right now, without looking at the platforms.

To get to a Democracy Chronicles page that links to many party-platforms, click on the following link:

Click here

Later, repeated use of the "back arrow" at the screen's upper left, should return you here to vote.

Error-Note: Though Lynn Kahn is listed below as a candidate of the Freedom Road Socialist Party, actually Lynn Kahn is an independent candidate, and is not the candidate of that party, and is not primarily the candidate of any party (though some parties might adopt and nominate her). That incorrect party-designation was probably the result of an outdated website, &/or spellchecker error.
So:

Rank in order of preference as many or as few candidates as you want to: