Rank order–from most to least important–what you consider to be the issues confronting the PHD-Design list currently?
1. Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) |
2. Lack of tolerance for a wide range of views in mailing list discussions loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 30–28 |
3. Continued dominance of the ‘scientific’ worldview in mailing list discussions loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 41–15, loses to Lack of tolerance for a wide range of views in mailing list discussions by 42–17 |
4. Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of mailing list discussions loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 36–27, loses to Continued dominance of the ‘scientific’ worldview in mailing list discussions by 32–30 |
5. Insufficient discussion of supervision of PhD candidates and examination of theses. loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 38–22, loses to Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of mailing list discussions by 33–27 |
6. Insufficient attention to moral and political issues in mailing list discussions loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 41–15, loses to Insufficient discussion of supervision of PhD candidates and examination of theses. by 34–26 |
7. Lack of discussion of practical issues of PhD candidature and examination loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 41–18, loses to Insufficient discussion of supervision of PhD candidates and examination of theses. by 27–26 |
8. Lack of information on post-doctoral fellowships and academic job opportunities loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 42–19, loses to Lack of discussion of practical issues of PhD candidature and examination by 29–23 |
9. Capture of the PHD-Design mailing list by interest groups with political rather than scientific goals loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 40–18, loses to Lack of information on post-doctoral fellowships and academic job opportunities by 29–23 |
10. Excessive discussion of issues of sexism and argumentation style in PHD-Design list culture loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 41–17, loses to Capture of the PHD-Design mailing list by interest groups with political rather than scientific goals by 30–18 |
11. Excessive emphasis on issues of diversity in mailing list discussions loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 46–10, loses to Excessive discussion of issues of sexism and argumentation style in PHD-Design list culture by 28–14 |
12. Excessive posting of conference calls, jobs advertisements and self-promotion. loses to Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture by 46–9, loses to Excessive emphasis on issues of diversity in mailing list discussions by 25–16 |
For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Marginalization of feminist, racial, and/or non-Western views in mailing list culture | - | 30 | 41 | 36 | 38 | 41 | 41 | 42 | 40 | 41 | 46 | 46 | |
2. Lack of tolerance for a wide range of views in mailing list discussions | 28 | - | 42 | 43 | 44 | 50 | 44 | 46 | 49 | 50 | 50 | 54 | |
3. Continued dominance of the ‘scientific’ worldview in mailing list discussions | 15 | 17 | - | 32 | 33 | 35 | 38 | 37 | 37 | 39 | 42 | 44 | |
4. Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of mailing list discussions | 27 | 20 | 30 | - | 33 | 31 | 33 | 36 | 42 | 44 | 47 | 48 | |
5. Insufficient discussion of supervision of PhD candidates and examination of theses. | 22 | 16 | 28 | 27 | - | 34 | 27 | 35 | 36 | 38 | 45 | 49 | |
6. Insufficient attention to moral and political issues in mailing list discussions | 15 | 10 | 18 | 25 | 26 | - | 29 | 34 | 35 | 34 | 39 | 42 | |
7. Lack of discussion of practical issues of PhD candidature and examination | 18 | 15 | 22 | 24 | 26 | 29 | - | 29 | 30 | 35 | 37 | 44 | |
8. Lack of information on post-doctoral fellowships and academic job opportunities | 19 | 16 | 24 | 22 | 21 | 25 | 23 | - | 29 | 31 | 37 | 39 | |
9. Capture of the PHD-Design mailing list by interest groups with political rather than scientific goals | 18 | 11 | 22 | 17 | 22 | 21 | 26 | 23 | - | 30 | 36 | 37 | |
10. Excessive discussion of issues of sexism and argumentation style in PHD-Design list culture | 17 | 8 | 17 | 11 | 19 | 19 | 20 | 23 | 18 | - | 28 | 33 | |
11. Excessive emphasis on issues of diversity in mailing list discussions | 10 | 8 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 13 | 13 | 11 | 11 | 14 | - | 25 | |
12. Excessive posting of conference calls, jobs advertisements and self-promotion. | 9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 11 | 16 | - |
Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.
Feel like voting on something else? Try one of these public polls: