Supervisor: Luke Feast <>
Announced end of poll: Monday 3 September 2018
Actual time poll closed:
This is a public poll.
Actual votes cast: 66
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Minimax
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

To participate you should rank order—from very important to not at all important—what you consider to be the issues confronting the PHD-Design list currently?

Result

1. Marginalization of women’s views in discussions  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Exclusion of diverse epistemological views in discussions  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 32–28
3. Intolerance of diverse cultural views in discussions  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 30–26, loses to Exclusion of diverse epistemological views in discussions by 32–29
4. Prejudice toward topics of most interest to those list members of high academic rank  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 33–26, loses to Intolerance of diverse cultural views in discussions by 31–30
5. Insufficient discussion of topics relevant to PhD studies in particular  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 41–20, loses to Prejudice toward topics of most interest to those list members of high academic rank by 32–31
6. Harmful effects of narrow interests on the quality of argumentation  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 40–21, loses to Insufficient discussion of topics relevant to PhD studies in particular by 35–26
7. Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of argumentation  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 41–19, loses to Harmful effects of narrow interests on the quality of argumentation by 30–26
8. Excessive posting of irrelevant information  loses to Marginalization of women’s views in discussions by 52–9, loses to Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of argumentation by 46–13

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  12345678
1. Marginalization of women’s views in discussions   -32 30 33 41 40 41 52
2. Exclusion of diverse epistemological views in discussions   28 -32 33 35 42 42 53
3. Intolerance of diverse cultural views in discussions   26 29 -31 37 38 42 48
4. Prejudice toward topics of most interest to those list members of high academic rank   26 27 30 -32 33 36 48
5. Insufficient discussion of topics relevant to PhD studies in particular   20 26 28 31 -35 31 44
6. Harmful effects of narrow interests on the quality of argumentation   21 21 27 29 26 -30 48
7. Harmful effects of careless reasoning on the quality of argumentation   19 20 21 26 29 26 -46
8. Excessive posting of irrelevant information   9 8 13 12 14 13 13 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

Feel like voting on something else? Try one of these public polls:

Loading...