Supervisor: 4nn1l2 <>
Announced end of poll: No
Actual time poll closed:
This is a test poll.
Actual votes cast: 17
Number of winning choices:
This poll implements proportional representation. The best-candidate criterion is used to identify each voter's preferred set of choices.
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Minimax
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

Proportional Schulze using OpaVote ballots

with "rank of their favorite choice" enabled.

Choices (in individual preference order)

  1. In fact
  2. Ladsgroup
  3. PHoBiA
  4. Wikimostafa
  5. Darafsh
  6. AzorAhai
  7. Omid.koli
  8. Sa.vakilian
  9. Nshervsampad
  10. Fatemi
  11. M7S6M

Winning set of choices

The apparent winner of this poll was the set of choices ( 1,2,3,4,8 ):

  1. In fact
  2. Ladsgroup
  3. PHoBiA
  4. Wikimostafa
  5. Sa.vakilian

Preference matrix

There are 462 possible sets of 5 choices that can be formed by selecting from the 11 choices. Of these, 7 sets were considered thoroughly, comparing against the 35 nearby (similar) sets that differ in just one choice.

This is the voting preference matrix, reporting maximal valid proportional preferences. Fractional digits indicate nonproportional preferences, which help break ties in proportional preference.

  1234567
1. (1,2,3,4,8)   -3.07 3.06 5.07 9.09 10.1 13.13
2. (1,2,3,4,5)   0.09 -0.09 4.09 11.11 9.11 8.09
3. (1,2,3,4,6)   0.1 0.07 -4.09 3.09 9.1 8.11
4. (1,2,3,5,6)   0.09 0.06 0.07 -10.1 6.09 8.1
5. (1,2,4,5,6)   0.07 0.05 0.07 0.05 -6.07 7.09
6. (2,3,4,5,6)   0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.09 -6.08
7. (1,3,4,5,6)   0.04 0.08 0.04 0.07 0.08 0.09 -

Pairwise comparison

You can compare any two sets of choices. Just enter the numbers of the choices (from 1 to 11) in each set, with the numbers of one set's choices in the left column and the numbers of the other's in the right column.

Set 1Set 2

Nonproportional poll

The following gives the details of how the poll would have resulted if run on single choices, without proportional representation. This hypothetical poll defines the “individual preference order” used above.

Ranking of the choices

Winning choices are shown in bold.

1. Ladsgroup  (Not defeated in any contest vs. another choice)
2. PHoBiA, loses to Ladsgroup by 9–8
3. In fact, loses to PHoBiA by 9–7
4. Wikimostafa, loses to In fact by 9–6
5. Darafsh, loses to Wikimostafa by 9–7
6. AzorAhai, loses to Darafsh by 9–7
7. Sa.vakilian, loses to AzorAhai by 10–6
8. Omid.koli, loses to AzorAhai by 9–7
9. Nshervsampad, loses to Omid.koli by 8–6
10. Tied:
Fatemi, loses to Nshervsampad by 10–4
M7S6M, loses to Nshervsampad by 9–3

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  1234567891011
1. Ladsgroup   -9 8 10 11 9 11 11 12 13 13
2. PHoBiA   8 -9 10 9 11 8 10 12 14 13
3. In fact   9 7 -9 10 11 8 11 9 12 13
4. Wikimostafa   7 5 6 -9 9 7 9 10 11 11
5. Darafsh   4 7 6 7 -9 9 10 9 12 11
6. AzorAhai   8 5 5 6 7 -10 9 11 12 12
7. Sa.vakilian   6 7 6 6 7 6 -7 9 10 10
8. Omid.koli   4 6 5 4 4 7 7 -8 10 8
9. Nshervsampad   5 3 5 3 7 4 4 6 -10 9
10. Fatemi   2 2 2 3 1 4 3 2 4 -5
11. M7S6M   2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 5 -

Ballot report

 AzorAhai Darafsh Fatemi In fact Ladsgroup M7S6M Nshervsampad Omid.koli PHoBiA Sa.vakilian Wikimostafa
1. 2 10 10 1 3 10 6 10 0 4 5
2. 5 8 9 2 10 3 0 4 7 6 1
3. 10 10 10 10 0 10 10 1 10 10 10
4. 4 3 10 0 1 10 5 10 2 10 10
5. 10 1 2 5 0 10 10 10 4 3 10
6. 0 2 9 8 5 10 7 4 6 3 1
7. 2 10 10 5 10 10 4 10 3 1 0
8. 3 0 8 2 4 9 10 5 1 7 6
9. 10 7 8 1 0 10 6 2 3 4 5
10. 5 1 10 10 0 10 10 4 2 10 3
11. 5 7 9 3 10 6 0 8 4 1 2
12. 3 2 10 10 1 10 10 10 0 10 10
13. 4 7 10 5 6 9 3 2 8 0 1
14. 4 10 10 1 10 10 5 10 2 0 3
15. 8 1 6 5 0 3 9 2 4 10 7
16. 4 3 1 2 0 10 10 10 10 10 10
17. 6 4 10 1 3 8 9 5 0 7 2

Ballots are shown in a randomly generated order.

[Download ballots in CSV format]

Feel like voting on something else? Try one of these public polls:

Loading...