Supervisor: Göran Krampe <>
Announced end of poll: 2009-03-08, 18.00 UTC
Actual time poll closed: Sun Mar 8 14:03:10 2009
Private poll (435 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 188
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

The 7 highest rated candidates from the list will comprise the Squeak Leadership Team starting from the end of voting, and being effective for a year. Remember that your vote is considered as a ranking of all candidates. The virtual candidate "None Of The Below" should only be ranked higher than any candidates that you would prefer not to see in the Board at all. For more information and details, see the official 2009 elections page at: http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6116

Result

1. Andreas Raab  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Bert Freudenberg  loses to Andreas Raab by 112–40
3. Craig Latta  loses to Andreas Raab by 107–52, loses to Bert Freudenberg by 83–68
4. Randal L. Schwartz  loses to Andreas Raab by 112–47, loses to Craig Latta by 80–68
5. Ken Causey  loses to Andreas Raab by 120–37, loses to Randal L. Schwartz by 85–69
6. Igor Stasenko  loses to Andreas Raab by 134–35, loses to Ken Causey by 83–72
7. Jecel Assumpcao Jr  loses to Andreas Raab by 130–39, loses to Igor Stasenko by 84–74
8. Matthew Fulmer  loses to Andreas Raab by 127–36, loses to Jecel Assumpcao Jr by 81–69
9. Edgar J. De Cleene  loses to Andreas Raab by 146–26, loses to Matthew Fulmer by 94–64
10. Brent Pinkney  loses to Andreas Raab by 165–12, loses to Edgar J. De Cleene by 101–43
11. David Mitchell  loses to Andreas Raab by 164–12, loses to Brent Pinkney by 53–41
12. None Of The Below  loses to Andreas Raab by 172–9, loses to David Mitchell by 114–39

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  123456789101112
1. Andreas Raab   -112 107 112 120 134 130 127 146 165 164 172
2. Bert Freudenberg   40 -83 84 98 113 106 109 127 155 152 167
3. Craig Latta   52 68 -80 94 102 101 96 116 135 136 156
4. Randal L. Schwartz   47 71 68 -85 104 99 101 122 135 134 150
5. Ken Causey   37 52 56 69 -83 89 80 116 140 142 162
6. Igor Stasenko   35 53 58 58 72 -84 75 103 127 128 157
7. Jecel Assumpcao Jr   39 57 54 63 67 74 -81 111 123 130 159
8. Matthew Fulmer   36 55 64 58 63 73 69 -94 125 127 158
9. Edgar J. De Cleene   26 40 42 52 47 55 47 64 -101 99 125
10. Brent Pinkney   12 10 19 26 13 24 28 21 43 -53 114
11. David Mitchell   12 10 20 22 14 26 31 19 48 41 -114
12. None Of The Below   9 11 18 18 14 20 14 13 41 39 39 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.
1. Andreas Raab   -112–40 107–52 112–47 120–37 134–35 130–39 127–36 146–26 165–12 164–12 172–9
2. Bert Freudenberg   . -83–68 84–71 98–52 113–53 106–57 109–55 127–40 155–10 152–10 167–11
3. Craig Latta   . . -80–68 94–56 102–58 101–54 96–64 116–42 135–19 136–20 156–18
4. Randal L. Schwartz   . . . -85–69 104–58 99–63 101–58 122–52 135–26 134–22 150–18
5. Ken Causey   . . . . -83–72 89–67 81–69 116–47 140–13 142–14 162–14
6. Igor Stasenko   . . . . . -84–74 81–69 103–55 127–24 128–26 157–20
7. Jecel Assumpcao Jr   . . . . . . -81–69 111–47 123–28 130–31 159–14
8. Matthew Fulmer   . . . . . . . -94–64 125–21 127–19 158–13
9. Edgar J. De Cleene   . . . . . . . . -101–43 99–48 125–41
10. Brent Pinkney   . . . . . . . . . -53–41 114–39
11. David Mitchell   . . . . . . . . . . -114–39
12. None Of The Below   . . . . . . . . . . . -