It's that time again. Time to VOTE for the Squeak Oversight Board. Please take the time to vote!!! The 7 highest ranked odd number of candidates from the list will comprise the Squeak Oversight Board starting from the end of the voting period until the next Board is elected. Remember that your vote is considered as a ranking of all candidates. Voting for "None of the Below" allows you to vote for the people you want most without having to vote for candidates that you do not prefer. Candidates that get less votes than "None of the Below" ARE NOT elected to the board. In the case that "None of the Below" is chosen above the 7 candidates needed, the board will have fewer than 7 members for the year. If you don't have a preference between two candidates rank the users with the same rank. Ranking "None of the Below" above other members indicates your desire to vote against the remaining candidates. Select a lower rank than "None of the Below" to! vote against them. Please contact firstname.lastname@example.org if you have any questions or for more information. Your question and answer will be posted to squeak-dev. For more information and details, see the official 2016 elections page at http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6346 There are some great candidates. Please VOTE!!
|1. Bert Freudenberg (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)|
|2. Tim Rowledge loses to Bert Freudenberg by 55–32|
|3. Craig Latta loses to Bert Freudenberg by 69–22, loses to Tim Rowledge by 58–25|
|4. David T. Lewis loses to Bert Freudenberg by 63–21, loses to Craig Latta by 50–40|
|5. Chris Muller loses to Bert Freudenberg by 75–18, loses to David T. Lewis by 54–33|
|6. Levente Uzonyi loses to Bert Freudenberg by 70–20, loses to Chris Muller by 45–44|
|7. Marcel Taeumel loses to Bert Freudenberg by 70–18, loses to Levente Uzonyi by 47–34|
|8. Edgar J. De Cleene loses to Bert Freudenberg by 78–15, loses to Marcel Taeumel by 59–30|
|9. None of the Below loses to Bert Freudenberg by 93–3, loses to Edgar J. De Cleene by 82–10|
For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.
|1. Bert Freudenberg||-||55||69||63||75||70||70||78||93|
|2. Tim Rowledge||32||-||58||55||66||54||55||75||91|
|3. Craig Latta||22||25||-||50||56||48||49||62||91|
|4. David T. Lewis||21||29||40||-||54||44||51||63||92|
|5. Chris Muller||18||23||34||33||-||45||45||57||90|
|6. Levente Uzonyi||20||30||44||36||44||-||47||57||91|
|7. Marcel Taeumel||18||32||40||33||40||34||-||59||87|
|8. Edgar J. De Cleene||15||18||30||26||31||31||30||-||82|
|9. None of the Below||3||5||4||4||4||4||5||10||-|
Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.
The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.
|1. Bert Freudenberg||-||55–32||69–22||63–21||75–18||70–20||70–18||78–15||93–3|
|2. Tim Rowledge||.||-||58–25||55–29||66–23||54–30||55–32||75–18||91–5|
|3. Craig Latta||.||.||-||50–40||56–34||48–44||50–40||62–30||91–4|
|4. David T. Lewis||.||.||.||-||54–33||45–44||51–33||63–26||92–4|
|5. Chris Muller||.||.||.||.||-||45–44||45–40||57–31||90–4|
|6. Levente Uzonyi||.||.||.||.||.||-||47–34||57–31||91–4|
|7. Marcel Taeumel||.||.||.||.||.||.||-||59–30||87–5|
|8. Edgar J. De Cleene||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||-||82–10|
|9. None of the Below||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||.||-|