The 7 highest rated candidates from the list will comprise the Squeak Foundation Board starting from the end of voting, and for a year. Remember that your vote is considered as a ranking of all candidates. The virtual candidate "None Of The Above" should only be ranked over candidates that you would prefer not to see in the Board at all.
Some of the candidates have posted information about themselves and their candidacy on the squeak-dev list or other places. The official 2008 elections site includes some information, and is at:
http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6025
Note that in case of a tie final Results will follow The Condorcet completion rule: CIVS Ranked Pairs
1. Dan Ingalls (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices) |
2. Craig Latta loses to Dan Ingalls by 100–56 |
3. Bert Freudenberg loses to Dan Ingalls by 101–54, loses to Craig Latta by 79–75 |
4. Yoshiki Ohshima loses to Dan Ingalls by 121–34, loses to Bert Freudenberg by 86–56 |
5. Tim Rowledge loses to Dan Ingalls by 128–36, loses to Yoshiki Ohshima by 84–73 |
6. Randal L. Schwartz loses to Dan Ingalls by 129–36, loses to Tim Rowledge by 94–69 |
7. Igor Stasenko loses to Dan Ingalls by 141–25, loses to Randal L. Schwartz by 87–60 |
8. Giovanni Corriga loses to Dan Ingalls by 148–21, loses to Igor Stasenko by 84–54 |
9. Edgar J. De Cleene loses to Dan Ingalls by 153–15, loses to Giovanni Corriga by 72–69 |
10. Andrew P. Black loses to Dan Ingalls by 156–16, loses to Edgar J. De Cleene by 72–66 |
11. Matthew Fulmer loses to Dan Ingalls by 147–22, loses to Andrew P. Black by 68–65 |
12. Tansel Ersavas loses to Dan Ingalls by 150–19, loses to Matthew Fulmer by 70–65 |
13. None Of The Above loses to Dan Ingalls by 170–1, loses to Tansel Ersavas by 139–10 |
For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Dan Ingalls | - | 100 | 101 | 121 | 128 | 129 | 141 | 148 | 153 | 156 | 147 | 150 | 170 | |
2. Craig Latta | 56 | - | 79 | 88 | 96 | 115 | 126 | 138 | 132 | 139 | 137 | 129 | 162 | |
3. Bert Freudenberg | 54 | 75 | - | 86 | 92 | 106 | 118 | 127 | 124 | 129 | 130 | 132 | 163 | |
4. Yoshiki Ohshima | 34 | 72 | 56 | - | 84 | 94 | 112 | 119 | 119 | 123 | 124 | 122 | 159 | |
5. Tim Rowledge | 36 | 47 | 59 | 73 | - | 94 | 106 | 119 | 115 | 120 | 119 | 119 | 157 | |
6. Randal L. Schwartz | 36 | 47 | 60 | 67 | 69 | - | 87 | 99 | 105 | 97 | 97 | 102 | 150 | |
7. Igor Stasenko | 25 | 35 | 37 | 48 | 57 | 60 | - | 84 | 78 | 94 | 82 | 88 | 146 | |
8. Giovanni Corriga | 21 | 26 | 38 | 43 | 42 | 49 | 54 | - | 72 | 70 | 71 | 75 | 143 | |
9. Edgar J. De Cleene | 15 | 29 | 33 | 37 | 43 | 48 | 63 | 69 | - | 72 | 75 | 73 | 136 | |
10. Andrew P. Black | 16 | 22 | 26 | 38 | 31 | 42 | 49 | 67 | 66 | - | 68 | 72 | 136 | |
11. Matthew Fulmer | 22 | 25 | 26 | 37 | 38 | 40 | 54 | 68 | 69 | 65 | - | 70 | 137 | |
12. Tansel Ersavas | 19 | 31 | 26 | 37 | 39 | 43 | 50 | 62 | 73 | 69 | 65 | - | 139 | |
13. None Of The Above | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 14 | 14 | 12 | 10 | - |
Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.
Feel like voting on something else? Try one of these public polls: