Supervisor: Göran Krampe <>
Announced end of poll: 8th march, 18.00 UTC
Actual time poll closed: Sat Mar 8 13:00:26 2008
Private poll (437 authorized voters)
Actual votes cast: 178
Number of winning choices:
Condorcet completion rule:    (What is this?)
Schulze/Beatpath/CSSD
CIVS Ranked Pairs
MAM
Condorcet-IRV

Poll description

Squeak Foundation Board Election 2008

The 7 highest rated candidates from the list will comprise the Squeak Foundation Board starting from the end of voting, and for a year. Remember that your vote is considered as a ranking of all candidates. The virtual candidate "None Of The Above" should only be ranked over candidates that you would prefer not to see in the Board at all.

Some of the candidates have posted information about themselves and their candidacy on the squeak-dev list or other places. The official 2008 elections site includes some information, and is at:

http://wiki.squeak.org/squeak/6025

Note that in case of a tie final Results will follow The Condorcet completion rule: CIVS Ranked Pairs

Result

1. Dan Ingalls  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Craig Latta  loses to Dan Ingalls by 100–56
3. Bert Freudenberg  loses to Dan Ingalls by 101–54, loses to Craig Latta by 79–75
4. Yoshiki Ohshima  loses to Dan Ingalls by 121–34, loses to Bert Freudenberg by 86–56
5. Tim Rowledge  loses to Dan Ingalls by 128–36, loses to Yoshiki Ohshima by 84–73
6. Randal L. Schwartz  loses to Dan Ingalls by 129–36, loses to Tim Rowledge by 94–69
7. Igor Stasenko  loses to Dan Ingalls by 141–25, loses to Randal L. Schwartz by 87–60
8. Giovanni Corriga  loses to Dan Ingalls by 148–21, loses to Igor Stasenko by 84–54
9. Edgar J. De Cleene  loses to Dan Ingalls by 153–15, loses to Giovanni Corriga by 72–69
10. Andrew P. Black  loses to Dan Ingalls by 156–16, loses to Edgar J. De Cleene by 72–66
11. Matthew Fulmer  loses to Dan Ingalls by 147–22, loses to Andrew P. Black by 68–65
12. Tansel Ersavas  loses to Dan Ingalls by 150–19, loses to Matthew Fulmer by 70–65
13. None Of The Above  loses to Dan Ingalls by 170–1, loses to Tansel Ersavas by 139–10

For simplicity, some details of the poll result are not shown.  

Result details

  12345678910111213
1. Dan Ingalls   -100 101 121 128 129 141 148 153 156 147 150 170
2. Craig Latta   56 -79 88 96 115 126 138 132 139 137 129 162
3. Bert Freudenberg   54 75 -86 92 106 118 127 124 129 130 132 163
4. Yoshiki Ohshima   34 72 56 -84 94 112 119 119 123 124 122 159
5. Tim Rowledge   36 47 59 73 -94 106 119 115 120 119 119 157
6. Randal L. Schwartz   36 47 60 67 69 -87 99 105 97 97 102 150
7. Igor Stasenko   25 35 37 48 57 60 -84 78 94 82 88 146
8. Giovanni Corriga   21 26 38 43 42 49 54 -72 70 71 75 143
9. Edgar J. De Cleene   15 29 33 37 43 48 63 69 -72 75 73 136
10. Andrew P. Black   16 22 26 38 31 42 49 67 66 -68 72 136
11. Matthew Fulmer   22 25 26 37 38 40 54 68 69 65 -70 137
12. Tansel Ersavas   19 31 26 37 39 43 50 62 73 69 65 -139
13. None Of The Above   1 3 2 5 4 8 4 8 14 14 12 10 -

Ballot reporting was not enabled for this poll.

The following matrix shows the strength of the strongest beatpath connecting each pair of choices. Choice 1 is ranked above choice 2 if there is a stronger beatpath leading from 1 to 2 than any leading from 2 to 1.

  1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.
1. Dan Ingalls   -100–56 101–54 121–34 128–36 129–36 141–25 148–21 153–15 156–16 147–22 150–19 170–1
2. Craig Latta   . -79–75 88–72 96–47 115–47 126–35 138–26 132–29 139–22 137–25 129–31 162–3
3. Bert Freudenberg   . . -86–56 92–59 106–60 118–37 127–38 124–33 129–26 130–26 132–26 163–2
4. Yoshiki Ohshima   . . . -84–73 94–67 112–48 119–43 119–37 123–38 124–37 122–37 159–5
5. Tim Rowledge   . . . . -94–69 106–57 119–42 115–43 120–31 119–38 119–39 157–4
6. Randal L. Schwartz   . . . . . -87–60 99–49 105–48 97–42 97–40 102–43 150–8
7. Igor Stasenko   . . . . . . -84–54 78–63 94–49 82–54 88–50 146–4
8. Giovanni Corriga   . . . . . . . -72–69 72–69 72–69 75–62 143–8
9. Edgar J. De Cleene   . . . . . . . . -72–66 75–69 72–69 136–14
10. Andrew P. Black   . . . . . . . . . -68–65 72–69 136–14
11. Matthew Fulmer   . . . . . . . . . . -70–65 137–12
12. Tansel Ersavas   . . . . . . . . . . . -139–10
13. None Of The Above   . . . . . . . . . . . . -